Constrained Rationality: Formal Goals-Reasoning Approach to Strategic Decision & Conflict Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper proposes Constrained Rationality, a formal qualitative goals and constraints reasoning framework for single and multi agents to analyze and rationalize about strategic decisions/conflicts. The framework suggests bringing back the strategic decision making problem to its roots: reasoning about options/alternatives, not to satisfy a set of preferences, but rather to satisfy the explicitly stated strategic and conflicting goals an agent has, given the internal and external complex and conflicting realities/constraints the agent has. The paper analyzes the relations among goals and constraints, how value property labels for goals (such as their achievement or prevention levels) propagates through these relations, and proposes a set of propagation rules and an algorithm to calculate the final value labels for goals at any point of time. The paper also presents some preliminary experimental results on using the algorithm to reason about a business strategic decision making scenario.
منابع مشابه
Common reasoning in games: a Lewisian analysis of common knowledge of rationality*
The focus for the Centre is research into individual and strategic decision‐making using a combination of theoretical and experimental methods. On the theory side, members of the Centre investigate individual choice under uncertainty, cooperative and non‐cooperative game theory, as well as theories of psychology, bounded rationality and evolutionary game theory. Members of the Centre have appli...
متن کاملBIM-Tool: Modeling and Reasoning Support for Strategic Business Models
The BIM-Tool provides graphical modeling and analysis support for the Business Intelligence Model (BIM). BIM-Tool is a standalone application built on top of Eclipse. The tool supports two kinds of automated reasoning: (1) bottom-up “what-if” analysis: given input labels about some elements of a BIM model (for example, success/failure for leaf goals), do these propagate to other elements in the...
متن کاملNICK CHATER∗ and MIKE OAKSFORD THE RATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MIND AND BEHAVIOR
Rational analysis (Anderson 1990, 1991a) is an empirical program of attempting to explain why the cognitive system is adaptive, with respect to its goals and the structure of its environment. We argue that rational analysis has two important implications for philosophical debate concerning rationality. First, rational analysis provides a model for the relationship between formal principles of r...
متن کاملHeuristic Bias, Conflict, and Rationality in Decision-Making
B.M. Glatzeder et al. (eds.), Towards a Theory of Thinking, On Thinking, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_2, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 Abstract Half a century of reasoning and decision-making research has shown that human thinking is often biased. People seem to over-rely on intuitions and gut feelings instead of on more demanding, deliberative reasoning when making decisions. The o...
متن کاملRelationships between Rational Decisions, Human Motives, and Emotions
In the decision-making and rationality research field, Rational Decision Theory (RDT) has always been the main framework, thanks to the elegance and complexity of its mathematical tools. Unfortunately, the formal refinement of the theory is not accompanied by a satisfying predictive accuracy, thus there is a big gap between what is predicted by the theory and the behavior of real subjects. Here...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009